Hi Andrew, > Oh, that was some development logging I forgot to remove. > I'll backport that fix in a moment too.
All right. Thanks! Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:42 AM, <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > >> > Done. > >> > � > >> > �http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/f7da9d09ebd2 > > > > > > It seems to move with your patch definitely. > > > > But, the following error is reflected on log. > > Does not this error have any problem? > > > > Apr 27 16:37:00 srv01 pengine: [5839]: ERROR: native_merge_weights: Applying > group:internal_colocation > > Apr 27 16:37:12 srv01 pengine: [5839]: ERROR: native_merge_weights: Applying > group:internal_colocation > > Oh, that was some development logging I forgot to remove. > I'll backport that fix in a moment too. > > > > > Best Regards, > > Hideo Yamacuhi. > > > > > > --- renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > > >> Hi Andrew, > >> > >> > Done. > >> > � > >> > �http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/f7da9d09ebd2 > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> Hideo Yamauchi. > >> > >> --- Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > >> > >> > Done. > >> > � > >> > �http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/f7da9d09ebd2 > >> > > >> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:18 AM, �<renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> > >> > wrote: > >> > > Hi Andrew, > >> > > > >> > > Version 1.0 is necessary for us. > >> > > Please backport your revision to version 1.0. > >> > > > >> > > Best Regards, > >> > > Hideo Yamauchi. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > --- renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Hi Andrew, > >> > >> > >> > >> > Fixed in: > >> > >> > � > >> > >> > �http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/4c775a4abc87 > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> > >> Hideo Yamauchi. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> --- Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > Fixed in: > >> > >> > � > >> > >> > �http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/4c775a4abc87 > >> > >> > > >> > >> > 2010/4/22 �<renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp>: > >> > >> > > Hi, > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > We tested the cluster constitution of four nodes. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > srv04 is a standby node, and others are active nodes. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > We use INIFINITY for resouce-stickiness well. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > But, there was a problem for resource placement when we set > >> > >> > > INIFINITY in > >> > resouce-stickiness. > >> > >> > > (An OVDBgroup02-1 resource did not start in an active srv01 node.) > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > There was not a problem for resource placement when we set 1000 in > resouce-stickiness. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > * resource-stickiness=1000 > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > [r...@srv01 ~]# crm_mon -1 > >> > >> > > ============ > >> > >> > > Last updated: Thu Apr 22 15:34:03 2010 > >> > >> > > Stack: openais > >> > >> > > Current DC: srv01 - partition with quorum > >> > >> > > Version: 1.0.8-52c101df29bd1851b2ea6dc13bbba450418d103b > >> > >> > > 4 Nodes configured, 4 expected votes > >> > >> > > 9 Resources configured. > >> > >> > > ============ > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Online: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Resource Group: UMgroup01 > >> > >> > > UmVIPcheck (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv01 > >> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-1 > >> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB1 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started > >> > >> > > srv01 ---> not > problem > >> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-2 > >> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB2 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started > >> > >> > > srv02 > >> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-3 > >> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB3 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started > >> > >> > > srv03 > >> > >> > > Clone Set: clnUMgroup01 > >> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > Clone Set: clnPingd > >> > >> > > Started: [ srv02 srv03 srv01 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > Clone Set: clnDiskd1 > >> > >> > > Started: [ srv02 srv03 srv01 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > Clone Set: clnG3dummy1 > >> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > Clone Set: clnG3dummy2 > >> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > * resource-stickiness=INFINITY > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > [r...@srv01 ~]# crm_mon -1 > >> > >> > > ============ > >> > >> > > Last updated: Thu Apr 22 15:23:43 2010 > >> > >> > > Stack: openais > >> > >> > > Current DC: srv01 - partition with quorum > >> > >> > > Version: 1.0.8-52c101df29bd1851b2ea6dc13bbba450418d103b > >> > >> > > 4 Nodes configured, 4 expected votes > >> > >> > > 9 Resources configured. > >> > >> > > ============ > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Online: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Resource Group: UMgroup01 > >> > >> > > UmVIPcheck (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv01 > >> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-1 > >> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB1 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started > >> > >> > > srv04 ---> problem > >> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-2 > >> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB2 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started > >> > >> > > srv02 > >> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-3 > >> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB3 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started > >> > >> > > srv03 > >> > >> > > Clone Set: clnUMgroup01 > >> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > Clone Set: clnPingd > >> > >> > > Started: [ srv02 srv03 srv01 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > Clone Set: clnDiskd1 > >> > >> > > Started: [ srv02 srv03 srv01 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > Clone Set: clnG3dummy1 > >> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > Clone Set: clnG3dummy2 > >> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ] > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > When we do not use colocation, this problem does not happen. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > We think that a difference of resource-stickiness influences it. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > When we put colocation and resoucre-stickiness together, will the > >> > >> > > calculation of the > >> > score > >> > >> be > >> > >> > right? > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Is the movement when we set INIFINITY in resource-stickiness a > >> > >> > > bug? > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > * I read the next document to examine colocation. > >> > >> > > * > >> > >> > > http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/File:Colocation_Explained_-_White.pdf > >> > >> > > * However, I was not able to understand the connection with > resource-stickiness. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Best Regards, > >> > >> > > Hideo Yamauchi. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > >> > > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > >> > >> > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > >> > >> > > Getting started: > >> > >> > > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > >> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > >> > >> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > >> > >> > Getting started: > >> > >> > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> > >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > >> > >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > >> > >> > >> > >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > >> > >> Getting started: > >> > >> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > === 以下のメッセージは省略されました === _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
