2010/3/24 <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp>: > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for comment. > >> So if I can summarize, you're saying that clnUMdummy02 should not be >> allowed to run on srv01 because the combined number of failures is 6 >> (and clnUMdummy02 is a non-unique clone). >> >> And that the current behavior is that clnUMdummy02 continues to run. >> >> Is that an accurate summary? > > Yes. > >> If so, then I agree its a bug. Could you create a bugzilla entry for it >> please? > > I understood. > I register this problem in Bugzilla.
Thanks > How about my next question? > Is the difference of the replacement of the clone in N1 and N4 specifications? > >>Of a clone rising in a N1(srv01) node at the time of "globally-unique=false" >>is replacing it right? >>In addition, is it right movement that replacement does not happen even if a >>clone breaks down in a > N4(srv04) node? Do you mean: why is the clone on srv01 always $clone:0 but on srv02 its sometimes $clone:0 and sometimes $clone:1 ? _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
