Hi, On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:10:31PM +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote: > Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:02:48PM +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote: > >>Lars Ellenberg wrote: > >> > >>>Or, if this is as infrequent as you say it is, have those blobs in a > >>>regular file system on a regular partition or LV, and replace every > >>>"echo> blob" with "echo> blob&& csync2 -x blob" (you get the idea). > >>Unfortunately, that'd mean modifying software I don't really have > >>control over. :-/ > > > >If they are infrequent, running csync2 as a cron job once a > >minute would do, right? > > I don't think that'd be safe for this particular application. The > use case is CMS file uploads. > > It's more likely that you'll see three writes in one minute and then > no writes for 3 days than that you'll see the same volume of writes > spread over the same length of time. > > >ocfs2 introduces an extra level of complexity. You don't want > >that unless really necessary. > > How would that complexity manifest?
By trying to support fs read/write operations on multiple hosts in parallel perhaps :) Thanks, Dejan > Martin > > -- > Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who > want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
