We are also planning to do this with citrix xenserver. I'm not yet totally convinced by the availability/complexity ratio. We may just use the ha options from xenserver.
If we go down the pacemaker route, we are planning to do stonith using the python xmlrpc bindings. I suspect that our main benefit will be the ability to do updates etc with limited downtime. Also looking for anyone to discuss this sort of thing with, planning to use the mailing list at this stage with any issues we encounter. Cheers, Joe On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Matthew Palmer <mpal...@hezmatt.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:52:34AM +0100, Sander van Vugt wrote: > > I'm working on different Xen HA projects, but sometimes get the idea > > that I'm the only one on the planet doing such projects. Is there anyone > > on the list involved in Xen HA projects? I would appreciate having the > > opportunity to exchange some thoughts now and then. > > We're doing it at $DAYJOB. Can't say it's been a rousing success. > > - Matt > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
