On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:06 PM, E-Blokos <in...@e-blokos.com> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Beekhof" <and...@beekhof.net> > To: <pacema...@clusterlabs.org> > Cc: <pacema...@clusterlabs.org> > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 4:11 AM > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] impossible to find > againpacemaker-1.0.5-4.2-x86_64on internet > > >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:29 AM, E-Blokos <in...@e-blokos.com> wrote: >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Beekhof" <and...@beekhof.net> >>> To: <pacema...@clusterlabs.org> >>> Cc: <pacema...@clusterlabs.org> >>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 2:43 AM >>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] impossible to find again >>> pacemaker-1.0.5-4.2-x86_64on internet >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:52 AM, E-Blokos <in...@e-blokos.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> on all mirrors, example >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://mirror.etf.bg.ac.yu/opensuse/repositories/server:/ha-clustering/openSUSE_11.1/x86_64/ >>>> >>>> htere are all rpm BUT pacemaker-1.0.5-4.2-x86_64, why ? >>>> >>>> I really need it to make my node to work again. >>> >>> Then you really should have made some backups. >>> Try a more recent version from http://clusterlabs.org/rpm >>> >>>> >>>> Thank you very much >>>> >>>> Franck >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> You right Andrew, next time will make a special backup. (of the whole >>> HD?) >>> for now I'm trying to copy by hand all related files from another node >> >> rpm -ql pacemaker pacemaker-libs is probably a good start >> other than that, i cant help >> >>> to >>> the destroyed one >>> I tried other more recent version and all failed. >> >> In what way? >> > > > different ways, 1.0.6 install conflict with /etc/ha.d/shellfunc, even > deleted it stays the error.
--force would have worked there. > 1.0.7 openais changed completly the config (openais to corosync etc..) so I > don't want to reconfigure all the cluster > only because of an minor update. It's the exact same contents, just located in a different place. > Also why the old version of pacemaker are > not accessible anymore ? OBS never kept old versions around, the only reason they were around so long is that no-one was updating it anymore. > I'm sorry tbut no all people can follow the speed and hidden changes of > updates Thats fine, but you also can't expect the internet to be your backup system ;-) _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker