I ran the command: crm_standby -U ubuntu_2 -v on
this seems to work to put ubuntu_2 into standby. -Frank > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 5:51 AM > To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] another basic configuration question > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Frank DiMeo > <frank.di...@bigbandnet.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm using the enclosed .xml file to control the startup sequence and > collocation of two resources. When I use this xml file, I get the > following behavior: > > > > 1) start both nodes, resources world1 and world2 start up in the > correct sequence on ubuntu_2 > > 2) execute crm_standby -U ubuntu_2 v -on, world2 and world2 stay on > ubuntu_2. This seems odd. > > Did you paste that command or type it wrong? > If you ran: > crm_standby -U ubuntu_2 -v on world2 > > It should have worked. Unless the resources refused to stop. > > Please clarify what you actually ran and then i'll be able to comment > on the rest. > > > 3) execute crm_standby -U ubuntu_2 v -off, world2 and world2 stay on > ubuntu_2. > > 4) execute crm_resource --resource world1 --move -h ubuntu_1, world1 > and world2 stay on ubuntu_2. Again, I thought world1 could move, and > if it did, would take world2 with it. > > 5) execute crm_resource --resource world1 --un-move -h ubuntu_1 > > 6) try to move world2, it won't move either, but this is not > unexpected given the collocation constraint. > > 7) stop pacemaker (via /etc/init.d/openais stop) on ubuntu_2, and > after about a minute, corosync et al stop, but world1 and world2 still > continue to run on ubuntu_2, and both resources ALSO start running on > ubuntu_1. > > > > I've checked my resources using ocf-tester on both nodes (both pass > on both nodes), and also manually verified both RA's on both nodes. > Does this behavior make sense given the xml file? > > > > I've also run both of these resources using ONLY the collocation > constraint (without the ordering constraint), the they seem to behave > as I'd expect (i.e. they run on the same node together even when > forcibly moved, or when a node is put into standby), as long as I > specify "sequential=true" in the collocation constraint. However, if I > specify "sequential=false" in the collocation constraint, each resource > tries to execute on the node opposite of the one that's running the > other resource. > > > > Thanks again in advance, > > Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pacemaker mailing list > > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
