On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Florian Haas wrote: > On 10/03/2009 10:48 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > >> There is _no guarantee_ that the staging repositories will always be up > >> to date with the latest and greatest found at hg.linux-ha.org or > >> hg.clusterlabs.org. Those willing to contribute patches to Pacemaker, > >> Agents, Glue or Heartbeat should _not_ pull from hg.linbit.com, but from > >> the original repositories instead. > > > > Would it make sense to maintain these changes in the > > hg.linux-ha.org and hg.clusterlabs.org trees? > > The idea was to provide a staging ground for Debian-related changes. > That is to say, once the new Debian build infrastructure stabilizes, > Andrew and Dejan pull into the upstream trees. Then from that point > forward, Debian-specific changes can be committed first into Martin's > trees, so Debian users can test them before they hit upstream. > > It's all just intended to be a means of facilitating collaborative > Debian-specific package maintenance. Make sense?
Understood. Sounds like an excellent idea to me. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
