Hi, On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 04:50:54PM +0200, Erik Hensema / HostingXS wrote: > Op vrijdag 04 september 2009 14:41:18 schreef Johan Verrept: > > On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 14:32 +0200, Florian Haas wrote: > > > If it's not of any concern to you that your hard failover is not > > > automatic, why not go with the meatware "plugin" (aka human > > > intervention) in the first place? > > > > Unless I misunderstood his setup, only when the power to the other half > > the datacenter fails will the stonith fail. There are plenty of other > > cases where the node seems dead but the stonith will work fine. > > Indeed. I'm using stonith to recover from all the usual failures such as > kernel panics, resources refusing to stop, etc. However when the power of a > node fails human intervention is needed. I just didn't know how to do this, > but now I've found out. Thanks.
So which way did you adopt? One option is also to delete the node which is definitely dead from the cluster configuration. Thanks, Dejan > -- > Met vriendelijke groet, > > > Erik Hensema / HostingXS Internet Services > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > [email protected] > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list [email protected] http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
