I am using 1.0.3, but the failure-timeout thing does not seem to work for pingd.

Eliot Gable
Senior Engineer
1228 Euclid Ave, Suite 390
Cleveland, OH 44115

Direct: 216-373-4808
Fax: 216-373-4657
ega...@broadvox.net


CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION.  This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to 
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please call me 
immediately.  BROADVOX is a registered trademark of Broadvox, LLC.


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 11:49 AM
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] PingD Failure-Timeout

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Eliot Gable <ega...@broadvox.net> wrote:
> Is there a way to time-out the failure of PingD?

Yes, but you need version >= 1.0.0
I assume you're not running it as a clone right?

>
>
>
> In my configuration, I cannot run PingD all the time on every node. Only one
> node (the master) has public Internet access. I use PingD to cause the
> master to fail-over to one of the slaves. When a slave becomes master, it
> then gains public Internet connectivity. When it is a slave, the entire
> interface is down, so not even the gateway is reachable. So, I set up a
> PingD resource that is co-located with the master resource in the Master
> state. I also set up constraints that assign a -1000 score to a node for
> each resource if that node loses connectivity to the gateway. The result is
> that if I firewall off ICMP on the master, it correctly fails over to a
> slave. Then, it runs a stop on the master, as expected since it has a -1000
> score. The result is that my master resource runs as Master on the node that
> was the slave, and is Stopped on the node that was the master. However, it
> is still stuck with a -1000 score, and will never restart on the node that
> was the master until PingD thinks it has connectivity back. But that won't
> happen because PingD no longer runs on that node since the interface is down
> on it and it won't see anything if it did.
>
>
>
> I set a failure-timeout on the PingD resource, but it does not seem to do
> anything. Running 'crm_verify -VVVVV -L 2>&1 | less' shows that the -1000
> score stays there, even well past the failure-timeout.
>
>
>
> Anybody have any suggestions how I can automatically clear that -1000 score
> after a certain (small) interval of time?
>
>
>
>
>
> Eliot Gable
> Senior Engineer
> 1228 Euclid Ave, Suite 390
> Cleveland, OH 44115
>
> Direct: 216-373-4808
> Fax: 216-373-4657
> ega...@broadvox.net
>
> CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION.  This e-mail and any files transmitted with it
> are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or
> entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please call me immediately.  BROADVOX is a registered trademark of Broadvox,
> LLC.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> CONFIDENTIAL. This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and should
> be destroyed and/or returned if you are not the intended and proper
> recipient.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
>

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

CONFIDENTIAL.  This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and should 
be destroyed and/or returned if you are not the intended and proper recipient.

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Reply via email to