On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:38:58PM -0400, Eliot Gable wrote: >> I believe it is not expecting the resource to be running, but a >> monitor action shows that it is running. > > If that was the case, then CRM would do something about it > (stop/migrate). > >> Thus, it is not >> technically in the correct state, so a warning should be >> issued. If the resource is managed, then Pacemaker will start >> it by itself, but expects it to be not running to begin with. > > Basically, the CRM should be the only one to start/stop the > resources it manages. Now, perhaps after the resource cleanup > (i.e. status section removed for the resource on some node), it > could still reduce the severity. This warning I normally > encounter on cluster startup. No idea how complex would that be. > Andrew?
There's not really any way to know that we're in a post-cleanup scenario. But for probes the log message could probably be downgraded to "info". I'll do that once I recover my machine :-/ _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
