On Feb 16, 2009, at 2:07 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I've been forced to install latest 1.0 snapshot to one of production
servers
since pingd in 1.0.1 was unusable for me. So I'm already testing
what's going
to be 1.0.2 release :)
Everything works as expected (even the pingd with multiple NICs).
good to hear :)
But today I noticed that there might be one more problem with pingd,
it seems
to be leaking memory somewhere :(
on my testing machine, pingd uses (I mean RSS, not VIRT) ~160M RAM,
and on
production machine it is already ~360MB, which is quite a lot for
small pinging
daemon :)
indeed. i've fixed a few memory leaks recently, I'll have to check if
pingd was affected.
If You have time, could You have a look at it? I'll gladly provide
You with
more information if needed.
i should be able to reproduce locally
you could file a bug though - that would help
with best regards
nik
PS: I'm replying to this mail for second time, sorry if my mail
reached You twice,
but I'm bit confused about mail address... everybody seems to be
using pacema...@clusterlabs.org,
(as well as reply address), but mail returned to me with user
unknown, and mailmain info says pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
should be used.
hmmm - odd. i'll investigate. thanks!
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 06:04:12PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Its probably been noticed that I haven't been around much lately, and
that the December release is overdue - to put it politely.
Rest assured I'm still here working overtime on Pacemaker, but my
contractual obligation to get the cluster stack ready for SLES11 are
taking up most of my time at the moment.
It also hasn't helped that my test cluster kept throwing up new and
exciting errors that CTS (not Pacemaker) wasn't equipped to handle -
such as syslog logging with the pre-dhcp-assigned hostname :-/
Which of course doesn't help those of you hitting bugs in 1.0.1
that I
fixed ages ago.
So what I propose to do is, now that CTS is running smoothly again,
run
the regression tests on Monday/Tuesday and release 1.0.2 with the
caveat
that it has only been tested on OpenAIS. It _should_ continue to
work on
Heartbeat, there's no reason why it wouldn't, but I won't have the
bandwidth to verify this for the next month or so.
Then, with luck, it'll be back to a regular 1.0.3 in March thats been
tested with both stacks.
Of course if someone wanted to volunteer to do the testing on
Heartbeat,
that would also be a significant help :-)
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
--
-------------------------------------
Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava
tel.: +420 596 603 142
fax: +420 596 621 273
mobil: +420 777 093 799
www.linuxbox.cz
mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: ser...@linuxbox.cz
-------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
