having an unreliable stonith mechanism is worse than not having one at all. > > what if your resource fencing has a bug? its the same problem. > > reliable fencing is a fundamental requirement of the cluster.
i understand . but If i can do both (node as well as resource fencing) then there is very very rare chance that both will fail at same time. i will again say it would be really good if something can be done to implement resource fencing in openais-pacemaker. dont you agree with this. > > > 2) no, it cant. > it wont have quorum and therefor isn't allowed to start cluster resources if i set no-quourm to stop (Which is default) then i feel following things will happen 1) resouces will be stopped at all nodes who belong to no-quourm partition and fail over to a nodes which have quorum. 2) All nodes of no-quorum partion will be stonithed by nodes having quorum. am i right? if openais -pacemaker provide something for resouce fencing we would have >> completely ruled out above possiblities Please share your view. >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
