On 19 Feb 2024, at 13:09, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 2/19/24 11:14, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19 Feb 2024, at 10:34, LIU Yulong wrote:
>>
>>> Hi OVS experts,
>>>
>>> Our ovs-vswitchd runs to core at the ovs_mutex_trylock(&ukey->mutex) in the
>>> function revalidator_sweep__.
>>>
>>> I've sent the mail before but have no response.
>>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2023-August/052604.html
>>>
>>> So I'm trying to send this mail again. And I may apologize in advance
>>> because
>>> I would like to post as much useful information as possible to help identify
>>> potential issues. So this mail will have a really long text.
>>>
>>> Compared to the mail 2023-August/052604.html, we upgrade the OVS to 2.17.8
>>> and DPDK to 22.11 to pray for good luck that maybe the community has
>>> potential
>>> fixes for this issue. But unfortunately, the ovs-vswitchd still runs to
>>> core.
>>
>> As you mentioned it looks like some memory corruption, which I have not seen
>> before.
>>
>> Have you tried this without rte offload? This is the only feature I never
>> used.
>> There is a 2.17.9 with DPDK 22.11.6 you could try.
>
> OVS 2.17 is not supposed to work with DPDK 22.11, it's supposed to work with
> 21.11.
> See the compatibility table here:
> https://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/faq/releases/
>
> Though it's hard to tell if DPDK version is anyhow related to the issue.
My mistake, I was supposed to type 21.11.6 :( But yes if they are using 22.11,
that could also be the problem. I would suggest using the supported version and
see if the problem goes away.
//Eelco
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
