Hi Ajit, I'm using the following versions.
dpdk_version : "DPDK 21.11.2" ovs_version : "3.0.1" Best regards. On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:12 AM Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:02 AM Lazuardi Nasution <mrxlazuar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > I think I can understand your opinion. So your target is to prevent > frames with those ethernet addresses from reaching CP, right? FYI, I'm > using bonded VFs of bonded PFs as OVS-DPDK interfaces, so offcourse LACP > should be handled by bonded PFs only. > What is the version of DPDK & OVS used here, BTW? Thanks > > > > > Best regards, > > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 11:54 PM David Marchand < > david.march...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 5:46 PM Lazuardi Nasution < > mrxlazuar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > HI David, > >> > > >> > Don't you think that offload of reserved Ethernet address should be > disabled by default? > >> > >> What OVN requests in this trace (dropping) makes sense to me if those > >> lacp frames are to be ignored at the CP level. > >> I don't see why some ethernet address would require some special > >> offloading considerations, but maybe others have a better opinion on > >> this topic. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> David Marchand > >> >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
