We are also looking towards some kind of BGP functionality in
Neutron/OVN, because a provider/external networks does not scale well,
especially without network segmentation support.

Currently we are working on POC implementation of a BGP speaker plugged
into Neutron which will announce /32 prefixes to an external router.

AFAIK The OVN VTEP L2 gateway implementation is very limited and does
not have HA, but I may be wrong.

IMHO BGP-EVPN is a better way to extend virtual networks, especially
when you already have EVPN in your physical network.


On 09.03.2021 23:04, Sergey Chekanov wrote:
> Looks like what I want to do.
> But seems they do not want to use current VTEP Gateway functionality
> as a base for it, will be interesting why...
>
> On 10.03.2021 00:47, Daniel Alvarez wrote:
>> +Ankur
>>
>>> On 9 Mar 2021, at 22:34, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not arguing against it, I just don't know of anyone working on it.
>>
>> Nutanix folks presented this in the OVS/OVN conf last fall:
>>
>> http://www.openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2020/slides/OVS-CONF-2020-OVN-WITH-DYNAMIC-ROUTING.pdf
>> <http://www.openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2020/slides/OVS-CONF-2020-OVN-WITH-DYNAMIC-ROUTING.pdf>
>>
>>
>> I am not sure about the progress though.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:23:31AM +0300, Sergey Chekanov wrote:
>>>> I mean why not use EVPN to extend OVN logical switch (with current
>>>> VTEP
>>>> Gateway functionality)?
>>>> Is it a good Idea to implement it as a BGP daemon which will takes
>>>> records
>>>> from vtep database?
>>>> The reason is: not all switches support vtep schema, but almost all
>>>> support
>>>> EVPN.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe it is bad idea... We just start use OVN, so I am not sure,
>>>> will be
>>>> happy to listen your opinions.
>>>>
>>>> On 10.03.2021 00:11, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:40:58PM +0300, Sergey Chekanov wrote:
>>>>>> Is there are any plans for support BGP EVPN for extending virtual
>>>>>> networks
>>>>>> to ToR hardware switches?
>>>>>> Or why it is bad idea?
>>>>> I haven't heard anyone mention such plans.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> disc...@openvswitch.org
>>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> disc...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to