In the controlled test, I set the MTU down to 1360, so the vxlan overhead would 
still fit under 1500, which is what that lan segment supports. I am assuming my 
options are either to support larger/jumbo frames or set the hosts lower than 
1500. Is there any way to do this on the OVS side?

Dennis Heim | Domain Architect (Collaboration Labs)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:[email protected]]<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
[cid:[email protected]]<xmpp:[email protected]>[cid:[email protected]]<tel:+13142121814>[cid:[email protected]]<sip:[email protected]>
“The most powerful person in the world is the story teller. The storyteller 
sets the vision, values and agenda of an entire generation that is to come” – 
Steve Jobs
"Leaders who don't listen will eventually be surrounded by people who have 
nothing to say" --- Andy Stanley
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“Imagination is more important than knowledge.”  -- Albert Einstein
“If you can raise the level of effort and performance in those around you, you 
are officially a leader” – Urban Meyer
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“Mediocore managers play checkers (assuming everyone is the same). Great 
managers play chess (acknowledging that everyone is unique)” – Marcus Buckingham
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>

From: Guru Shetty <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 12:45 PM
To: Heim, Dennis <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS + VXLAN Performance

How do you define "poor" performance? If it is awfully low, it is likely that 
your [ outer MTU < (inner MTU + vxlan header)]. You can reduce your inner MTU 
and see the difference.

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 06:34, Heim, Dennis 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I am running Ubuntu on virtualized hosts, along with VXLAN. However, the VXLAN 
performance has been poor. I am trying to verify the VM environment. Any 
recommendations from a performance tuning perspective? Is it possible to get 
good performance with VXLAN in virtual hardware, or would I be better going 
with a different tunnel type.

Thanks,

Dennis Heim | Domain Architect (Collaboration Labs)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:[email protected]]<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
[cid:[email protected]][cid:[email protected]]<tel:+13142121814>[cid:[email protected]]
“The most powerful person in the world is the story teller. The storyteller 
sets the vision, values and agenda of an entire generation that is to come” – 
Steve Jobs
"Leaders who don't listen will eventually be surrounded by people who have 
nothing to say" --- Andy Stanley
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“Imagination is more important than knowledge.”  -- Albert Einstein
“If you can raise the level of effort and performance in those around you, you 
are officially a leader” – Urban Meyer
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“Mediocore managers play checkers (assuming everyone is the same). Great 
managers play chess (acknowledging that everyone is unique)” – Marcus Buckingham
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to