*ducking* because I'm not able to provide any experienced answer... However, because of what it does, it's going to do it with what is served. (OTRS does caching/compressing of its javascript, et al) and my impression (without knowing much more than what's on the box) is that mod_pagespeed is going to rework *that* ... better. (maybe. compression might not be useful, per the faq).
The FAQ <https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/module/faq> seems to indicate ?ModPagespeed=off can toggle when it's running. And, as per most of the times I stick my neck out and give an opinion, perhaps the only one who can determine that, for your environment, is you. Which isn't so bad. Maybe you could tell us your experience and be the one on the Internet to reference. :) On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Marty Hillman <mhill...@equuscs.com> wrote: > I have been noticing some performance lags lately and noticed my browser > does not always download the most correct CS/JS files. I was thinking > about installing mod_pagespeed to trigger the browser to get those > modifications. But I was curious as to whether anyone else has tried > mod_pagespeed and whether it provided any performance improvements in > OTRS. I have a feeling the answer will be to add more memory/cpu, but > every millisecond counts. I was surprised to not find any information > about the combo on a Google search. > > > > Marty > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ > Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs > To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs
