> On Dec 21, 2021, at 10:57 AM, Laura R <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> My question was removed from the original message, so I repeat it here: 
> 
> Is the Webb telescope connected in any way with the Eyeglass telescope that 
> Robert Lang helped develop at the turn of the century?
> 
> From Robert’s answer to Larry Finch, it does not get clear to me whether 
> there is a connection/continuation/inspiration from the Eyeglass to the Webb 
> (even if it’s something totally different) and I would like to know. Reason 
> is because at the Museo del Origami I always talk about the Eyeglass (and 
> there is a picture of it with Robert posing in front) and would be cool to 
> say something like: “Despite the fact that the Eyeglass stayed in the 
> prototype stage, it inspired new projects like so an so…”

There’s no connection between JWST and Eyeglass that I know of. (Other than 
that I’ve talked about them both in the same presentation many times.)

My initial understanding of Eyeglass was that a few years after my contribution 
(sometime after that photo was taken), the project ended, and the PIs went on 
to other projects (one left LLNL entirely for a startup). The uncertainty comes 
because several years later, I ran into a former laser colleague who was now 
fairly high up at LLNL and mentioned that I was sad that Eyeglass was dead, and 
he gave me a certain look and said “well, I wouldn’t be too sure of that.” Now, 
he could have been just messin’ with me, but I know it initially had interest 
from DoD types who don’t sign in their names when they visit, so he might have 
been hinting at something like that. But I guess I’ll never know (cause if they 
told me then they’d have to kill me).

There is, however, a connection from Eyeglass to StarShade. I developed a 
mathematical model for flashers for Eyeglass, and then much later adapted it 
for early versions of StarShade. (The StarShade team have since built further 
refinements into their model, but I think it’s still the same basic concept.)

HTH,

Robert

Reply via email to