>Robert Lang wrote - My thoughts: it still comes down to what one means by “an >original model”, or, “is claimable.” The way I would rephrase >what I *think* >you mean by “is original” or “is claimable” is, “do my contributions to this >artwork display significant creativity and novelty?”
On similar queries I have provided links to review legal cases surrounding derivative work/adaptations/transformations. This type of review can provide valuable insight on articulations regarding, as Robert said "significant creativity and novelty". "Dr. Google" will easily lead you to some great stuff on this topic. ORIFUN to all, Dianne
