>> This is the only study I know that did something like that. It was >> limited to a single router and is 2 years or so old. > this isn't a relevant study because the device in question was a > software-forwarded device (i.e. no separation between control plane and > forwarding plane). The devices we're talking about in this discussion are > systems which have separate management planes which can be overloaded by > excess traffic from the forwarding planes, unless specific mitigating > configuration is used. > > Not sure why the authors of that report used a C1841 - that device dates from > 2004.
The VPP project maintains lots of performance measurements for modern Intel CPUs. https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1810/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/index.html We haven’t measured extension header cost as far as I know. Ole _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
