On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, Brian Haberman wrote: > I have interpreted Ted's position to be that this document should simply > point to RFC 7045 (or its successor) for handling unknown extension headers.
I am probably confused, but the intended substance of the proposal in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec/current/msg01819.html was just that, and it got rejected. //cmh _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
