On 07/15/2014 09:36 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
> On 7/15/2014 5:08 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> The problem with both of these great inventions is that a single
>> box on the path that takes the "drop" option breaks everything,
>> whereas "ignore" at least provides best effort service and
>> protects against any specific attack on the middlebox.
>> As far as the destination host goes, HbH can't be any more
>> dangerous than a destination option.
> 
> IPv6 already indicates - inside the option type - what to do if an
> option isn't supported.
> 
> Why is honoring that set of flags not the only correct behavior?

Because, with the world as we know it, that ends up killing performance
-- with the corresponding implications (DoS) in extreme cases.

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [email protected]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492




_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to