But in 5.3.2 I see: Device Models - [...] Consideration should be given to how device-level models might fit with broader network and service Data Models.
Hmm, this seems to say more documentation in the *device-level* module. And later: A common challenge in YANG Data Model development lies in defining the relationships between abstract service or network constructs and the underlying device models. Therefore, when designing YANG modules, it is important to go beyond simply modeling configuration and operational data (i.e., leaf nodes), and also consider how the status and relationships of abstract or distributed constructs can be reflected based on parameters available in the network. Here it is not clear if the text refers to the device- or service-level module. [JMC] Good point. I’ve adjusted that text as well. PR is at https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/draft-opsarea-rfc5706bis/pull/221/changes Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
