No, I am not. Happy with the latest changes.
Thanks! Dhruv On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 6:56 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> wrote: > Druv, your email appears truncated. I took the statement that *did* come > through to mean you’re happy with the proposed, now live changes in -09. > Are you still asserting a major issue with the connection to ietf-acl-enh? > > > > Joe > > > > *From: *Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> > *Date: *Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 05:19 > *To: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]>, > [email protected] < > [email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl-08 early Opsdir review > > Hi Med, > > Thanks for the quick feedback and PR. The changes look good. More inline... > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 2:26 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Dhuv > > > > Thanks for the review. A PR to address your comments can be seen at: > > > https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/policy-based-network-acl/pull/114/files >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
