Dear all,
All authors have positively answered the IPR statement (in prep for the
WG call for adoption).
This is now documented as a comment in the draft history. See
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-netana-opsawg-ipfix-gpon-gem/history/
Regards, Benoit
Dear draft-netana-opsawg-ipfix-gpon-gem (and the WG at large),
In preparation of the WG call for adoption, we want to get a lay of
the land in terms of IPR.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
If yes to the above, please state either:
"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules”
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer
the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you
are aware of any relevant IPR.
Please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.
Regards, Joe and Benoit
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
