Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng....@foxmail.com> wrote:
> I think the text is fine to me. Just one suggestion, since Machine
> learning(ML) is a subset of AI, there is not need to specifically
> mention ML, it can be removed.
AI is a marketing term and means whatever journalists decide it means.
In the 1980s, it was chess.
In the 1990s, it was expert systems.
In the 2000s, it was about machine learning for non-generative systems
(vision, speech, ...)
In 2025, A1 referred to a meat sauce.
[JMC] Be that as it may, “AI” as a term and abbreviation for “Artificial
Intelligence” is being used in several technical IETF and IRTF drafts right
now. I couldn’t find a canonical reference to its definition but if there is
one, I’m happy to xref to it.
Joe
Machine Learning is an actual technical term.
LLMs are a subset of Machine Learning.
Please stick to technical terms with precise definitions.
So far, the impact on *networks* for of LLMs is web crawling.
"Frequent and Aggressive" query patterns is the key part.
It has nothing to do with chess.
> https://github.com/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/draft-opsarea-rfc5706bis/pull/113
So, I object to this change.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
