Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I've edited my ballot to be 'no objection'. I'm gathering that it not the Yang data model's responsibility to protect (particularly) sensitive values in storage, but only in transport. Given that raw private keys, epsk, and shared secrets for TLS connections are apparently stored in Yang data models in plaintext form, that there should be something in the Security Considerations as a warning. -------------------------------------- Thanks to Robert Sparks for their secdir review. Section 4, grouping tls13-epsk: 'Selfie-style reflection' attacks? Reference? _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
