As I work through the 123 chairs slides, I note a revised I-D is pending for the past month (sorry, I was out, too during this time). So that I can give an update (assuming the revision doesn't land after the holddown lifts), when do you plan to submit a revision to address the feedback?
Thanks. Joe On 6/10/25, 19:19, "Michael Richardson" <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: Guy Harris <ghar...@sonic.net<mailto:ghar...@sonic.net>> wrote: > How does >> Values from 0 to 32767 are allocated following a First-Come First-Served policy (Section 4.4 of [RFC8126]). Values in the ranges 0-10, 50-51, and 98-301 are already assigned; values in the ranges 11-49 and 52-97 MUST not be assigned. > sound? Seems to be exactly what Mahesh wants. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca<mailto:mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
