Hi,

On 30/4/25, 21:27, <[email protected]> wrote:
Tina Tsou <[email protected]> wrote:
    > I agree that’s a key point. Typically you’d verify the telemetry signing
    > key using a trust anchor – for example, a device certificate signed by a 
CA
    > you already trust or a key the operator installed. If the signing
    > certificate chains up to one of your trusted CAs/keys, then you know the
    > signature is valid. We should probably make this trust-anchor step 
explicit
    > in the draft.

So the reason I ask the question is because if the point is to have data
passed through a couple of steps, and still remain trustworthy, then it's not
clear to me that it the device certificate will be available to those third,
fourth and fifth parties.

The issue of trust management and the availability of trust roots is a general 
problem in any signature schema. We have added some text in the section on 
security consideration, following a suggestion from Linda, but trying to make 
clear that those trust management aspects are out of the scope of the document.

Be goode,


--

“Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno”



Dr Diego R. Lopez

Telefonica

https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr2lopez/



e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Mobile: +34 682 051 091

---------------------------------


--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide





________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede 
contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la 
persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda 
notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin 
autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente 
por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is confidential and privileged 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. 
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not 
read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this 
communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode 
conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa 
ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica 
notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização 
pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem 
por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e 
proceda a sua destruição
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to