Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-21: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work on this document and updating TACAS+ for TLS. I have read the shepherd writeup regarding the proposed PS status for this. Since the security issues were the reason why the base TACAS+ document was downgraded from PS and this document is fixing that, I would like to discuss with the authors/WG why they did not do this work as a BIS such that the base TACAS+ would also get elevated to PS status? Given its use, I would have thought updating TACAS+ to PS with this fix would be of help to the community. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
