Great catch, John! I've fixed those nits in I-D version 03.
Cheers,
Oliver
On 4/16/25 9:30 PM, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Oliver Gasser <oli...@ipinfo.io> said:
We have now published -02, which incorporates John's comments and some
more changes, mainly:
- Added third field in the CSV file for CGNAT scenarios
- Added detailed prefixlen examples for different scenarios
- Added one more example to the Security Considerations section
- Cleaned up a bunch of references
Much better. A few nits:
In the first para of 3.2 I would change "are not triggered" to "are adjusted."
There will always be some rate limits.
In the second para of 3.2 I think 5000 should be 4000.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
