In going through the shepherd write-up requirements, I note a few NITs in this document. The most correctable one is to remove the 2119 boilerplate and reference as this document doesn’t make use of any normative text.
As for the references to obsolete RFCs (1483 and 2625), I think they should stay as those are existing (legacy) usages of the linktypes registry. Updating those may have unintended consequences if one assumes aspects of MPEoATM or IP and ARP oFC in the newer RFCs that do not apply to the usages of the linktypes. But I want to confirm with the authors. And, as I stated before, I would like authors to confirm they are willing to be authors. Thanks. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
