FYI and a request to monitor this work as it will have implications on upcoming/ongoing work (and documents) in the routing areas well.
Please contribute to the discussion on the opsawg mailing list. Thanks, Ketan ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Benoit Claise <benoit.claise=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 4:19 PM Subject: [GROW] Fwd: RFC5706bis => draft-opsarea-rfc5706bis posted To: g...@ietf.org <g...@ietf.org> Cc: <draft-opsarea-rfc5706...@ietf.org> Dear all, The bcc option mentioned below doesn't work, surely because I reached the maximum amount of recipients. Hence this forwarded message to each individual OPS WG. Regards, Benoit -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Fwd: RFC5706bis => draft-opsarea-rfc5706bis posted Resent-Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:11:41 -0700 Resent-From: alias-boun...@ietf.org Resent-To: adr...@olddog.co.uk, benoit.cla...@huawei.com, chen....@zte.com.cn, cpign...@gmail.com, jcla...@cisco.com, thomas.g...@swisscom.com, tsamir.barg...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:09:23 +0200 From: Benoit Claise <benoit.claise=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> <benoit.claise=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org> <opsawg@ietf.org> CC: ops-...@ietf.org <ops-...@ietf.org> <ops-...@ietf.org>, draft-opsarea-rfc5706...@ietf.org, ops-ads <ops-...@ietf.org> <ops-...@ietf.org> Dear all, Sorry for sending this email to all OPS WGs (bcc'ed), however, we need to reach all of you in the OPS area. Below, you will see our AD's guidance to update the RFC 5706 "Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management of New Protocols and Protocol Extensions" Yes, it's about time to update this RFC, published in 2009, with the ideal end goal to have "Manageability Considerations" section all IETF drafts. As Med mentioned on the OPSAWG mailing list: "We need to find the right balance between providing clear guidance while avoiding some rigidity. We will explore that path together with other areas." Med will be sponsoring this document, as BCP, while RFC 5706 was published as Informational. Today, we passed the first milestone, with the publication of: A new version of Internet-Draft draft-opsarea-rfc5706bis-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Benoit Claise and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-opsarea-rfc5706bis Revision: 00 Title: Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management of New Protocols and Protocol Extensions Date: 2025-04-08 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 36 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-opsarea-rfc5706bis-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-opsarea-rfc5706bis/ HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-opsarea-rfc5706bis-00.html HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-opsarea-rfc5706bis Abstract: New protocols or protocol extensions are best designed with due consideration of the functionality needed to operate and manage the protocols. Retrofitting operations and management is sub-optimal. The purpose of this document is to provide guidance to authors and reviewers of documents that define new protocols or protocol extensions regarding aspects of operations and management that should be considered. This document obsoletes RFC 5706. What are the diffs compared to RFC5706? At this stage, not much: "same content as RFC5706. The only changes are the authors list and document track", as Med mentioned below. As this document is AD-sponsored, it now appears under https://datatracker.ietf.org/ag/opsarea/documents/ What do we expect from all of you? - please review the plan below. Feel free to comment. - we would like to know about some specific questions/open issues/improvements regarding the "Manageability Considerations" for your WG - PLEASE don't reply to all, as the discussion should happen on the OSPAWG mailing list. If you prefer, feel free to reply only to the contributors, in cc. Next, we will set up a github repo, populate the open issues, and start resolving them. Regards, Benoit on behalf of the contributors. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [OPSAWG]RFC5706-Refresh: Action Plan Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 06:22:36 +0000 From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> <opsawg@ietf.org>, ops-...@ietf.org <ops-...@ietf.org> <ops-...@ietf.org> CC: ops-...@ietf.org <ops-...@ietf.org> <ops-...@ietf.org> Hi all, First of all, many thanks to all the expressions of interest and comments sent on the list and also in private for this work. As indicated early this week, please find below the proposed action plan for the refresh of the “Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management”: - I will be sponsoring the document with joint LCs in all OPS WGs with the expected outcome to produce a ** BCP ** - The reference discussion venue will be OPSDIR + OPSAWG - Week of April 7th: - Authors to submit draft-ietf-opsarea-rfc5706bis-00 with the same content as RFC5706. The only changes are the authors list and document track. See attached. - Authors to send a call for inputs to all OPS WGs + reminder of the discussion venue. - OPS AD to send a note to all ADs to seek for cross-area inputs. - Authors to release revisions that address the initial list of change items and any comment from the call for inputs. - More clarity on the terminology and leverage the work led by Adrian in NMOP - IM part - More guidance on the importance of DMs - Soften the MIB part + IESG statement in MIBs - Add more YANG - Generalize the approach in RFC6123/ Manageability Considerations Section in all IETF Specs - IETF#123 Madrid: Present status and pending issues in OPSAREA Session. A slot is already booked for this. - Post IETF#123 - Authors to send reminder of call for inputs to all OPS WGs or follow-ups to specific points raised there in the first call. - Authors to release revisions to address pending issues and any received comments. - 09/2025: OPS AD to issue a LC shared in all OPS WGs. - 10/2025: IETF LC Here is the initial authors list: - Benoît Claise - Joe Clarke - Adrian Farrel - Thomas Graf - Samier Barguil - Carlos Pignataro - Ran Chen @authors: Please find attached a -00 of the text (md, xml, txt). I have a preference for the use of md + set a gitbub repo but I let you self-organize. You are holding the pen now :-) Please let me know if you have any comment. Thank you. Cheers, Med ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- g...@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to grow-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
