Dear Prasad,

Thanks for the feedback and confirming that that path delay measurement IPFIX 
entities are useful.

Indeed visibility into queuing, 
https://www.ietf.org/blog/banishing-bufferbloat/, in particular FQ-CoDel 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8290#section-3 dimensions would be 
very useful. Allow a network operator to understand which flows are ending up 
into which queue and how the CoDel algorithm is invoked on that queue.

With traditional per packet queuing 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7806 techniques, a mapping between 
queue to flow is not achievable with RFC 7015 Flow Aggregation. Therefore the 
scalability and applicability would be limited.

You are proposing additional congestion related IPFIX entities. From an 
implementation perspective, could you please describe the metrics from a 
network plane perspective more detailed, to which IPFIX dimensions and 
measurements they are applicable to and which use case your are trying to 
cover. I am willing to help how this could be at IETF OPSAWG in a dedicated 
document best addressed to.

Best wishes
Thomas

From: Prasad Yadati <ypra...@juniper.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2025 7:12 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org; Graf Thomas, INI-NET-VNC-E2E <thomas.g...@swisscom.com>; 
alex.huang-f...@insa-lyon.fr
Subject: Subject: Proposal to Augment 
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-14 with Throughput and Congestion 
Metrics


Be aware: This is an external email.



Subject: Proposal to Augment draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-14 with 
Throughput and Congestion Metrics



Dear OPSAWG Members,



I want to express my appreciation for the excellent work on 
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-14. The detailed IPFIX Information 
Elements (IEs) for delay performance metrics provide significant value to 
network operators and represent a strong foundation for real-time performance 
monitoring.



I am writing to propose an augmentation to the draft by incorporating 
throughput and congestion metrics. These additional metrics would complement 
the existing delay-focused IEs and enable network operators to correlate delay 
performance with throughput bottlenecks and congestion points, providing a more 
holistic view of network behavior.



Proposal Overview



The draft currently focuses on delay performance metrics such as 
pathDelayMeanDeltaMicroseconds and pathDelayMaxDeltaMicroseconds. While these 
are critical for delay monitoring, they do not address throughput or 
congestion, which are often the root causes of delays. I propose defining 
unique Information Elements (IEs) for throughput and congestion metrics to 
complement the existing delay metrics and provide operators with actionable, 
real-time insights into network performance.



Proposed Unique IEs



To extend the draft's IPFIX template, I propose adding the following unique IEs:
| IE Name              | Description                                      | 
Type            | Units              |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------------------|
| PacketsPerSecond      | Number of packets transmitted per second         | 
Float/Integer   | Packets/second     |
| BitsPerSecond         | Number of bits transmitted per second            | 
Float/Integer   | Bits/second        |
| CongestionDetectedFlag| Boolean flag indicating if congestion detected   | 
Boolean         | N/A                |
| CongestionStartTime   | Timestamp when congestion began                  | 
DateTime        | Seconds since epoch|
| CongestionEndTime     | Timestamp when congestion ended                  | 
DateTime        | Seconds since epoch|
| CongestionDirection   | Indicates congestion direction: ingress/egress  | 
Integer/Enum    | 1 = ingress, 2 = egress |

Advantages of the Proposed Enhancements

By incorporating throughput and congestion metrics into the draft, operators 
will benefit from:
    *          Enhanced Correlation: Correlate delay performance with 
throughput bottlenecks and congestion issues, offering deeper insights into the 
root causes of performance degradation.
    *          Holistic Network View: Gain a comprehensive perspective on 
network performance, enabling operators to monitor and troubleshoot delay 
issues alongside throughput and congestion in real time.
    *          Reduced Collector Overhead: Pre-calculated pps and bps metrics 
exported directly from devices reduce the processing burden on collectors, 
improving scalability in high-traffic environments.
    *          Improved Troubleshooting: Real-time access to these metrics 
enables faster diagnosis and resolution of performance issues.
    *          Simplified Export: Consolidating delay, throughput, and 
congestion metrics into a unified IPFIX template reduces operational complexity 
and export overhead.

I believe that incorporating these additional metrics into the draft aligns 
with its objectives and significantly enhances its utility for network 
operators. I would be honored to collaborate further on refining these 
enhancements and contributing to the draft as a co-author.

Please let me know your thoughts on this proposal.

Regards
yp


Juniper Business Use Only

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to