With the OPSAWG chairs and responsible AD Mahesh, we have been discussing a way to make progress on draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization, starting by defusing a situation, which we believe went way too far beyond technical arguments.
We have decided to hand over the document shepherd role to one of the OPSAWG chairs: Benoît. Benoît will continue the reaching out that Greg began to IPPM, DetNet (and others such as MPLS, SPRING, BIER, when/if appropriate) to solicit more conversation from the interested working groups. To that end, we will also look to get this draft on the presentation agendas for these working groups at IETF 122. We wanted to take a moment to thank Greg Mirsky for all his hard work as the document shepherd for draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization. Your expertise in OAM is incredibly valuable, and we appreciate the guidance you've provided so far. Because this document is intended for BCP, we do not take the need for broad consensus lightly. Ultimately, our goal is to gather as much feedback as possible before making a call as to whether to seek publication. Regarding the current document status, even if one WGLC is finished, we obviously foresee a second WGLC. And let's not forget that IETF LC is specifically targeted for this type of documents, with cross-WG, cross-area goals. Joe, Benoît and Mahesh
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
