On Nov 26, 2024, at 7:27 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > I'm afraid that we need to handle this globally (e.g., in UTA WG), not for > every application.
I agree. I spoke with Eric Vyncke in Dublin, and explained that while RFC 9325 is good, RADIUS and TACACS+ were having similar issues with TLS. i.e.. The TLS RFCs largely describe what TLS does, but are somewhat thin on how applications can use TLS. The RADEXT WG has spent substantial time digging into a number of issues, and updating drafts with what we've found. His suggestion was the same as yours: This needs to be done in UTA. He also pointed out that as someone involved in RADEXT, and as co-chair of UTA, I was the ideal person to write this document. The good news is that much of the necessary text is already in the RADEXT drafts, so perhaps the work isn't as large as it could have been, I'll try to find some time. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
