Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Thanks for summarizing, Michael. I’ll crank up an IPR poll and WG LC on
linktype now.
> As a contributor, I also don’t like “NG” or anything that inherently
> gets out of date immediately. I have no qualms with v2. We’ve seen
> this with other protocols.
Cool beans.
> Now, as a chair…
> What is your timetable for the other two? I don’t see PCAP changing
> much (being as it is historical). Would it make sense to WG LC this
> now as well?
I agree that pcap is ready to go.
I'll double check just to be sure.
pcapv2 needs work, and I've put off putting the icing on that cake until the
rest of the menu was sorted out. I imagine it can be in WGLC by the end of
the year, if not sooner.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
