Hi Paul,
I have already clarified this point in a reply to John's comment.
Let me clarify again:
* Both ipv6ExtensionHeaders and tcpOptions were initially defined in RFC 5102
* RFC 7012 obsoleted RFC 5102 and declared that:
## The IANA registry is for now the authoritative reference for these IEs:
"[IANA-IPFIX] is now the normative reference for IPFIX Information
Elements. When [RFC5102] was published, it defined, in its
Section 5, the initial contents of that registry."
## RFC 5102 provides the initial content of the registry
"This information model is maintained as the IANA "IPFIX
Information Elements" registry, the initial contents of which were
defined by RFC 5102."
or
"The IANA "IPFIX Information Elements" registry [IANA-IPFIX] is the
current complete reference for IPFIX Information Elements. The
initial values for this registry were provided by [RFC5102]."
* We can't update 7012 because:
"Information Element definitions have been removed, as the reference
for these is now [IANA-IPFIX]; a historical note on categorizations
of Information Elements as defined in [RFC5102] has been retained
in Section 5."
This is the reason we:
* cite [IANA-IPFIX] when we first mentioned ipv6ExtensionHeaders and tcpOptions
in the doc.
* list [IANA-IPFIX] as normative
Cheers,
Med
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Paul Wouters via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org>
> Envoyé : jeudi 11 juillet 2024 03:48
> À : The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v...@ietf.org; opsawg-
> cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; thomas.g...@swisscom.com;
> thomas.g...@swisscom.com
> Objet : Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-
> v6eh-17: (with DISCUSS)
>
>
> Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-17: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free
> to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This specification deprecates the ipv6ExtensionHeaders
> IPFIX IE
> in favor of the new IEs defined in this document.
>
> I don't see which RFC those were in, because this document does
> not
> Update: or Obsolete: the RFC that defined the
> ipv6ExtensionHeaders IPFIX IE
>
>
> This specification deprecates the tcpOptions IE
>
> Same here.
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
