Hi All, I fully support the work and would like you to see it progress within NETMOD, and have WG reviews and contributions.
As a co-author of the I-D and regular attendee of the network schedule side meetings we've had at the last few IETFs, this is an important capability that can be applied to several use cases. Thanks, Dan. From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 1:49 PM To: Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net>; net...@ietf.org Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] Adoption call for draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang-04 I support adoption of this work. It forms the foundation of work in other WGs, and I'm happy to have this worked by netmod if there is sufficient interest. As an opsawg co-chair, I'm copying opsawg to get their opinions. This work has been presented there and is a dependency of an ACL draft currently adopted by opsawg. Joe From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net<mailto:kent+i...@watsen.net>> Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 at 11:50 To: net...@ietf.org<mailto:net...@ietf.org> <net...@ietf.org<mailto:net...@ietf.org>> Subject: [netmod] Adoption call for draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang-04 NETMOD WG, This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: A Common YANG Data Model for Scheduling https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang PS: This draft moved from OPSAWG to NETMOD There is no known IPR on this draft: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/mg1KP3m6bCSXh-3N-YKLvEb_udk/ Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day Apr 10 (any time zone). Thank you, Kent (as co-chair) _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list net...@ietf.org<mailto:net...@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
