Hi Joe, Thank you very much. I am going to present and it will be local.
Best Regards, Olga From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday 24 October 2023 16:28 To: Olga Havel <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Session slot request in OPSAWG for draft-havel-opsawg-digital-map-01 We're not specifically asking for which slot people want. But it does seem like we will need to use Wednesday. Who is presenting and will they be local or remote? Joe From: OPSAWG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Olga Havel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 10:12 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [OPSAWG] Session slot request in OPSAWG for draft-havel-opsawg-digital-map-01 Dear Chairs, We would like to ask you for a session slot (10-15 mins) during the Wednesday session. We would like to present - the new version 01 of the draft: Modelling the Digital map based on RFC8345: Sharing Experience and Perspectives (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-havel-opsawg-digital-map/) - comparison between the 2 options for modelling IS-IS topology o option 1: based on the existing RFC8345 and the current version of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ogondio-opsawg-isis-topology o option 2: requires RFC8345 extensions, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ogondio-opsawg-isis-topology/ would evolve based on these extensions Best Regards, Olga
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
