The CfA has concluded, and there seems to be sufficient support from the WG to 
adopt this work.  There has been considerable discussion supporting this work 
with changes forthcoming based on those discussions.  There were no voiced 
objections.

Authors, please resubmit this draft as draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-00 
with NO other changes from the current draft in Datatracker.  Mark that this 
new version replaces draft-boucadair-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns.

Thanks.

Joe

From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 10:28
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: πŸ”” CALL FOR ADOPTION: RADIUS Extensions for Encrypted DNS
Hello, WG.  I like Henk’s subject icon.  Makes for some attention-grabbing.

This work has been discussed previously in opsawg, going back over a year.   
The authors have continued to progress the work and would like to gauge WG 
interest in adopting it.

One might ask, why opsawg?  The radext WG has been concluded, but, like IPFIX, 
there is interest in continuing to produce extensions for RADIUS.  It was 
suggested by Benjamin Kaduk that opsawg was a potential fit for this work.

Therefore, this kicks off a two-week CfA for 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns/.  
Please comment on-list with support and/or discussion of the work.

Thanks.

Joe
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to