Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <[email protected]> wrote: > Just for clarification: rather than re-inventing a format, the intent > we had is to try to take a snippet from one part of the current T+ > protocol, remove the fixed fields, and then re-use that in another > part.
You invented a new format. It needs a piece of bespoke buggy code to parse it. Please consider RFC8949: CBOR. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
