Hi John, Currently, the accounting and authorization methods are not defined in System model. Therefore, although Tacacs+ defines accounting and authorization type, there is no way to use it.
Regards, Bo -----邮件原件----- 发件人: john heasley [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2020年5月11日 13:42 收件人: Wubo (lana) <[email protected]> 抄送: john heasley <[email protected]>; Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]>; tom petch <[email protected]>; Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 主题: Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-03 Fri, May 08, 2020 at 09:45:51AM +0000, Wubo (lana): > I'll have to look at the model again; i do not recall if the model allows for > particular accounting types w/o augmentation. > > [Bo] The accounting type you mentioned, I understand, is that the System > model needs to be augmented. Currently, the System model only defines > authentication. Hey. System model has no accounting that I see. what am i missing; where are the accounting types defined? > About the model, do you think the "all" bit is still necessary? I am not advocating for nor against; only trying to explain how 'accounting' type might be used, which seemed to be misunderstood. [Bo] OK _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
