On 10/24/17 7:20 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote: > Hi Eliot, > > Your comment brings up something that I believe needs some clarification: > > > > > > > Better to > have a single class, given its commonality. There are very few such > common services on a network, but there are presumably one or two > others > that will come to be, and thus the ability to extend this list > over time. > > > I have a question about the scope of the class name to host address > mapping: > > A class URI "resolves" to a set of host addresses. > > Are classes globally scoped across all manufacturers (and devices) > for a given MUD controller? Or are they globally scoped (i.e. there is > a global registry of class name URI to host address list mapping > similar to DNS)?
Yes. That is the intent. But only URNs are registered. > > Perhaps some words about scoping can be put into the spec? > > I will take that as a last call comment if nobody objects. Eliot > Thanks, > > Ranga > > > > Eliot > > > > > -- > M. Ranganathan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
