Greg
Yes it is, generic YANG model steup the base framework. It can be extended to
add tools as well as other elements as well technology deviations. Alarms etc
either be part of this document will be a separate document that specifies
them. That is the reason we have designed the model as modular as possible and
extensible as possible.
Please let us know if any of the parts are not extensible or not modular enough.
Thanks
Tissa
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:17 PM, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Tissa, authors, et. al,
I've read documents and would like to clarify scope of these documents. OAM is
not limited to ping and traceroute functions. It even not limited to continuity
check. And in connectionless networks there would not be connectivity
verification. And the performance measurement is the big part of OAM as well as
protection coordination, defect alarms, and etc. Hence my question, is it in
plans of the authors to address all of OAM in respective documents?
Regards,
Greg
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)
<[email protected]> wrote:
All
>
>We have published YANG model for OAM. #1 draft below place the generic
>framework for OAM, that can be augmented for different technologies. #2 and #3
>are application of the concept to NVO3 and TRILL,
>
>1. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-netmod-oam/
>2. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-nvo3-yang-oam/
>3. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tissa-trill-yang-oam/
>
>Please review and share your comments
>
>Thanks
>Tissa
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>nvo3 mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>
>
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
