> >> We are currently working on logging of NAT events, and making this > >> consistent with the NAT MIB (which is also being revised). Currently the > >> NAT MIB has several notifications, indicating, in effect, resource > >> utilizations reaching a configured threshold. We will definitely be > >> adding these events to the logs (IPFIX and SYSLOG based). Do operators > >> need a choice between logs and SNMP notifications, or can we get rid of > >> the latter? > >> > > [WEG] Yes, I believe they need to stay in SNMP as well. While it > is possible to trigger alarms in a monitoring system via watching > logs for a certain condition/text string, it's vastly easier to make > it something you can manage via either a trap or polling a value and > evaluating the result. > > If they stay in SNMP, do they also need to stay in IPFIX/SYSLOG?
IMO, both should be kept. 1 - It provides implementation flexibility 2 - Both might actually be needed at the same time (for different operational groups with different needs, procedures and systems) /JF _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
