Hi, Jack and Mark. Yes, I think it is the same topic I proposed a few days' ago. Due to Chinese new year, me and my colleagues possibly can't join the following weeks call. However we will be at the call for Feb. 3. Chenliang can provide updates for the description file and also some details about that wish airship.
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> 代表 SHOSTAK, MARK 发送时间: 2020年1月23日 10:58 收件人: Jack Morgan <j...@jento.io>; opnfv-tech-discuss <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> 主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Weekly Technical Discussion Meeting #162 - 01/27/20 Thanks Jack. It's definitely a related topic, if not the same. That's great that we can leverage the Infra WG. I wasn't aware that was an option, but the less extra work we have to do, the better! Thanks, -Mark -----Original Message----- From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Jack Morgan Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 16:36 To: opnfv-tech-discuss <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Weekly Technical Discussion Meeting #162 - 01/27/20 Mark, Is this is same topic Fu Qiao proposed? I've tentatively schedule hers on Feb. 10th.but there is nothing stopping us to start the conversation now. For Monday, I propose the following... OPNFV Pod Descriptor File (PDF) 1) overview - what is it, why we have it 2) what is missing in version 1.0 that I would like to add for Jerma release 3) discuss what else needs to be added to version 2.0 4) how PDF relates to Airship and/or CNTT (I'm assuming this is where you are most interested) 5) anything else? A couple of comments to your email... PDF was created, maintained/owned by the Pharos project (and ultimately by the OPNFV community). Pharos is part of the Infra Work Group which also includes Releng/Security/XCI and LaaS projects. No need to create a new work group and reinvent the wheel. We would like to see more community involvement in the Infra WG projects to help us define value added feature for future OPFNV release. I hope this is helpful. Let me know if you or anyone else would like to add anything additional to the agenda above. Otherwise, I'll send out a meeting invite by EOD today. Thanks for the suggestion. On 1/22/20 12:20 PM, SHOSTAK, MARK wrote: > Hi Jack/all, > > Good timing. I'd like to propose some initial discussion on updating the PDF > format (I've heard the term "PDF 2.0") and a potential WG to identify the > best methodology/options to do so, ultimately to provide input to the TSC to > facilitate some form of ratification. > > Thanks, > -Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Jack Morgan > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 14:12 > To: opnfv-tech-discuss <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Weekly Technical Discussion Meeting #162 > - 01/27/20 > > OPNFV Community, > > I'm still looking for topics for the next Weekly Technical Discussion > Meeting on Monday, January 27th. Let me know if you have any agenda > items. Otherwise, I will cancel the meeting if I don't hear back by > EOD on Friday. -- Jack Morgan
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#23864): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/23864 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/70039965/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
