Hi, Alec. Also cc the CNTT RI WS. 
What you mentioned is very important. Within China Mobile, we are developing 
our own tools to automaticlly configure the TOR accross different vendors. I 
have to say this is a hard work since the TOR from different vendors varies a 
lot. But it really worth the time as what you point out, this is the main area 
where human errors accor.
For CNTT and OPNFV, currently the only active installer is airship. So I guess 
we will rely on that. Sridhar and the rest of the team is now trying the 
ariship installer out in POD 10. We are also trying to evolve the installer 
discription file to include network info, and as you said define HW 
configuration.  You can see the attached PR for more details about this.
https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/pull/535    



中国移动研究院
网络与IT技术研究所
付乔 15901025951
 
From: Alec via Lists.Opnfv.Org
Date: 2019-11-14 23:58
To: Rao, Sridhar
CC: opnfv-tech-discuss
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] RI Lab Infra. Discussion
Hi Sridhar
 
[+tech discuss list]
 
From my knowledge, very few NFVi installers know how to configure the TOR(s) 
and instead just assume that some admin will go and configure the TORs in a way 
that is compatible with the installer’s own networking blueprint – this is one 
of the main areas were human errors occur during installation as there can be 
hundreds of cables to wire manually and as many ports to configure on the TORs.
I know at least one (commercial) that does it but it only supports very 
specific model of TOR and very specific encaps/overlays.
 
My comment to engage the installer team was more related to the wiring design 
between TOR(s) and servers that make up an openstack platform, which are of 
predominant importance when it comes to HW configuration.
Any openstack installer will have to create a networking blueprint that will 
dictate how many TORs and how many physical interfaces are needed and what kind 
of traffic each will carry. Even with simpler VLAN
deployment, there are multiple openstack networks to map on physical interfaces 
and/or VLANs with possibility of VLAN trunking and HA.
It is clearly recommended to define the RI HW configuration with proper 
consultation with the installer team (this includes storage configuration as 
well as I mentioned in the wiki).
As I did not follow on CNTT meetings, I’m not sure which OPNFV team is in 
charge of installing openstack on the RI and what kind of installer it is.
 
Thanks
 
   Alec
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
From: "Rao, Sridhar" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 at 6:51 PM
To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <[email protected]>
Subject: RI Lab Infra. Discussion
 
Hello Alec,
 
I was reading your points in 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/CNTT+RI+Lab+Infrastructure+Discussion 
I fully agree with importance of TOR configurations – may I say, underlay 
network configuration.
You mention in multiple places, that this should be done by Installers. Can you 
please point me to an installer that can do this today. It would be very 
helpful.
Today, in Intel Pods – the underlay network (the type of networks, the IP plan, 
VLANs and switch configuration)  -Ex: Pod 10 
(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/pharos/Intel+POD10) – is setup by Intel team 
itself. 
Installer comes into picture only after this is set. I have not seen any 
installers which can also perform thoses step that Intel team is doing.
 
Cheers,
Sridhar
 
 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#23720): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/23720
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/57780218/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to