Thanks for your message that I cannot study right now, sorry!

I am going on holidays today and be back on August the 26th.

Just small answers:


-       It seems that when defined (!=0) the size of the cache silently limits 
the actual number of possible flows.

As soon as the cache size it not zero the transmission goes faster.



-       I noticed that starting the T-Rex into my host lead to a ~10 sec for 
initializing before the bound/configured message is displayed.

No such delay when launched within the NFVbench container

Maybe I wrongly shared the OFED binary needed for initializing the mellanox NIC.

I will look into T-Rex logs and other stuff when I come back.



See you later,
Pierrick

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[cid:image001.gif@01CF4791.BEC5FC70]<http://www.orange.com/>

orange labs

ORANGE/IMT/OLN/CISS/IIE/AMI


Pierrick LOUIN


4, rue du Clos Courtel  -  BP 91226

35512  CESSON SEVIGNÉ  cédex
tél      : +33 2 99 12 48 23
mob    : +33 6 43 33 01 04
e-mail : pierrick.lo...@orange.com<mailto:pierrick.lo...@orange.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

De : opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org] De la part de Michael S. Pedersen
Envoyé : vendredi 2 août 2019 15:04
À : opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Objet : Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] #nfvbench - Looking for line rate performances 
using NFVbench - CONTINUED

Hi Pierrick, Alec,

These findings are quite interesting indeed. I have only been using 
Connectx3-4, and always in a setting where line-rates like this hasn't been 
possible and/or relevant.

The increased performance after starting and stopping TRex is strange. I wonder 
if it could be something with the memory allocation on the initial startup?

The cache increase leading to higher performance makes more sense. I wonder if 
there is any correlation between number of flows and the cache size? If that is 
the case then it would make sense to use the value for number of flows as the 
cache size too (instead of having the additional input argument).

BR,
Michael

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#23427): 
https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/23427
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/32688323/21656
Mute #nfvbench: https://lists.opnfv.org/mk?hashtag=nfvbench&subid=2783016
Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to