I prefer to maintain it in installer project. If the affected content can be documented in installer project properly, it will be easier for maintainer, developer and end user.
Julien Alexandru Avadanii <[email protected]>于2017年10月15日周日 下午11:27写道： > Hi, > During the E release cycle, Fuel and Armband projects merged their > documentation(s). > Currently, the contents of Fuel's 'docs/' dir describe usage for both > architecture. > To keep the old behavior unchanged, we duplicated that docs dir in Armband > for now. > > Going forward, I think building the same documentation twice is wasteful > and unnecessary. > How do you think we should proceed in this case? > > We can agree that Armband project won't publish any docs going further, > and just remove the docs dir from our repo. > Or we can add a stub pointing to the Fuel project. > > Please let us know what you think. > > Thank you, > Alex > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss >
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
